Digital Camera's


I recently noticed that I my digital camera, has taken over 2100 photos. I got this camera new last October. It works fine. I think the focus is a little flaky indoors, but mostly it's ok.

I started thinking about how much 2100 photos would have cost me if I had used a traditional film camera.

2100 frames ÷ 36 = 58 rolls of 36 exposures
58 X $6 = $348

Now this camera cost about $400 last year, including extra rechargeable batteries and a larger memory card.

Now you might argue that I wouldn't have taken so many photo's had I not been using a digital camera where I can delete them so quickly. You would definitely be correct. However, there are a lot of great photo's that I might have missed had I not snapped so many.

I gotta say this kind of calculation sure takes the sting out of wanting to upgrade my digital camera every two years.

1 Comments

is there a way to look on your camera and know how many pictures are in its history or something? i think that would be an interesting thing to know.

June 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
Powered by Movable Type 4.1

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by tim published on May 9, 2003 2:56 PM.

N degrees of seperation was the previous entry in this blog.

When I am old ... is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.